While you're at it, read this one, too, from one of my all-time favorites, Joyce Valenza at her blog NeverEnding Search.
And this news article, by Hector Tobar at the L.A. Times, details the situation even further.
What's happening in LA a complete and total mockery of logical decision making, and it makes me fear for the future. It seems the LAUSD is subjecting their teacher-librarians to trials in order to prevent them from transitioning back into a classroom. TRIALS. What the heck is this about? Does this sound totally insane to anyone else?
From my understanding, the LAUSD is cutting their librarians. According to the system of senority and tenure, those with the most seniority are allowed to stay. Librarians are required to hold teaching certificates in addition to their librarian certificate, so they are, by right, qualified to be placed in a classroom, and should have seniority over some of their colleagues if they have several years in the system. And yet, they are being told they are not qualified to teach, and interrogated in the most disrespectful of ways to try to prove they are not qualified. Hence the trials.
It gets more complex. According to their current system in place, if a teacher has been out of the classroom for more than 5 years, they aren't allowed to return, despite seniority. According to Mizz Murphy's blog, the original intent for this was to prevent near-retirement, long removed teachers from returning to a school environment that had become foreign in their absence.
She says it much better than I am able...
"The logic behind the recency rule seems to be based on poor decision making from last year. LAUSD sent scores of people into classrooms who had been sitting in cubicles for ages. These were people with dusty old teaching credentials, waiting for retirement in the cool, air-conditioned Beaudry building in downtown LA...When layoffs began, these educators were saved because of their time served, but their office positions were cut and they went back to school for the first time in who knows how long. This did not go well.... So this year, LAUSD got wise. Make a rule that says that if you haven’t been in a classroom for five years, you can’t be in one ever again. No more problem, right?"
Except, well...BIG problem, as she goes on to elaborate. This has swiftly mutated to something very much other than the original reasoning: In the eyes of the LAUSD, the library is not technically a classroom, and librarians are not technically teachers (although according to Mizz Murphy, their contracts say otherwise). What a disgrace. This is a perfect case of how standardizing a rule to the extreme can swiftly spiral out of control when we stop thinking about what the rule was intended for in the first place.
To make things worse, the questions they are asking the librarians to answer are unbelievably asinine. To assert that the Dewey Decimal System is numerical, so librarians couldn't possibly have adequate knowledge of ELA is laughable. To imply that librarians do not teach is grossly disturbing.
It seems that they are creating a bunch of B.S. to reach an end goal of getting rid of librarians. They're hiding behind this crazy process of discrediting a whole group of people, forcing them to defend their competency, so they don't have to come right out and reveal their motives. Haven't they been observed by administrators? Haven't they been doing their job, and doing it well? If this is a question of meeting a bottom line, or balancing a budget, then please, do them a favor and be honest. To do otherwise is scary, and in the words of my husband, "dangerous thinking". I'm inclined to agree.
To make things worse, the questions they are asking the librarians to answer are unbelievably asinine. To assert that the Dewey Decimal System is numerical, so librarians couldn't possibly have adequate knowledge of ELA is laughable. To imply that librarians do not teach is grossly disturbing.
It seems that they are creating a bunch of B.S. to reach an end goal of getting rid of librarians. They're hiding behind this crazy process of discrediting a whole group of people, forcing them to defend their competency, so they don't have to come right out and reveal their motives. Haven't they been observed by administrators? Haven't they been doing their job, and doing it well? If this is a question of meeting a bottom line, or balancing a budget, then please, do them a favor and be honest. To do otherwise is scary, and in the words of my husband, "dangerous thinking". I'm inclined to agree.
It seems the plight of the library media specialist is growing exponentially...almost as quickly as new technology explodes on the scene. When will those in charge realize that library media specialists hold the key to harnessing the power of new technology? When will it become clear that we are discrediting these invaluable resources of information literacy when we need them more than ever? I was devastated over my job, but at least I didn't have to endure this.
My heart goes out to you, colleagues. Chins up, stay strong. My thoughts are with you.
No comments:
Post a Comment